Prognostics in the Control Loop

Shared by Miryam Strautkalns, updated on May 13, 2013


Author(s) :
L. Tang, G. Kacprzynski, M. Orchard, A. Saxena, K. Goebel, B. Saha

The term Automated Contingency Management (ACM) has been used to describe intelligent systems capable of mission re-planning and control reconfiguration in the presence of a current health state diagnosis. While a diagnostics driven ACM capability designed to optimize multi-objective performance criteria remains a significant technical challenge, it cannot hope to overcome the fact that it will always be a reactive paradigm. This paper, therefore, introduces an automated contingency management paradigm based on both current heath state (diagnosis) and future health state estimates (prognosis). Including Prognostics in the control loop poses at least two additional challenges to ACM. First, future state prediction will, in general, have uncertainty that increases as the prediction horizon increases so adaptive prognosis routines that manage uncertainty are critical. Secondly, a warning period afforded by prognosis allows ACM to be split into a real- time “reactive” component and a non-real time “planning” component that considers temporal parameters and the potential impact of being proactive with mitigating action. The proactive ACM paradigm was developed and evaluated in the context of a generic mono-propellant system model in Simulink/Stateflow with diagnostics, prognostics and an optimal reconfigurable control system. Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in prognostics enhanced ACM system are briefly discussed. Preliminary results from the on-going research work are presented and the paper is concluded with remarks on future work.

show more info
Publication Name
Publication Location
Year Published



Add New Comment